Illustration: Moa Thelander Expert conclusions on verbal extremism A Dispute over Methods The practice of mandatory recourse to linguistic experts’ opinions in cases pertaining to racial, ethnic, and other types of hatred and hostility, has caused the vast development of different approaches to the analysis of the texts. Solar fire gold download crack for pc. During last ten years, numerous methods for identifying “verbal extremism” have been recommended.
Tekst kak ob'ekt lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya [Text as an Object of. Lingvisticheskaya ekspertiza teksta: teoreticheskie. “Sudebnaia ekspertiza i vklad lingvista v interpretatsiiu zakona.” In From Poets to Padonki: Linguistic Authority and Norm Negotiation in Modern Russian Culture (Slavica Bergensia 9), edited by Ingunn Lunde and Martin Paulsen, 252–74.
It has been suggested that the evolution of Russian legal linguistics has not yet resulted in a “common theoretical basis for linguistic investigation in court that is shared by all experts”. The current status of the proposed approach to studying texts in order to identify “hostility and hate” demonstrates both the difficulty of establishing a general theoretical basis for forensic linguistics as a whole and the contradictions that arise in applying the numerous methodologies that exist in Russian science for studying “extremist” texts. Published in the printed edition of Baltic Worlds BW 3:2016, pp 10-19 Published on balticworlds.com on oktober 25, 2016.
Problems of the speech conflict as one of forms of social communication are considered in the article. On the basis of linguistic research of conversations record the most typical communicative situations, connected with the speech conflicts, are established. The linguistic-pragmatic characteristic of the communicative tactics, used by conflicting parties for realization of their intentions and upholding of their positions, is given. The social and legal assessment of the communicative conflict is given on the material of the text linguistic examination.